Preparing for any kind of presentation always takes me much
longer than I feel it should. As I
prepare for this panel presentation at RSA this week, the same anxieties are
resurfacing again. It isn’t that I’m anxious about people watching me, or that
I’ll trip and fall, or stumble over words, lose the war with technology, or
drop my notecards (although those things HAVE happened to me in the past). For
me, the anxiety comes from the fear that I won’t connect with my audience. Will
they get it? Will I be able to bring them along the journey of ideas I am
attempting to lay out before them?
Because really, let’s be honest. We’ve all seen the
presenter trip, drop the notecards, or fumble with tech behaving badly. And
when we do, we forgive them and even feel embarrassed on their behalf. These
are excusable things. These annoyances don’t necessarily disrupt the relationship between speaker and listener. Unless it is a clear case of the speaker just
really not being adequately prepared, we can work with a bit of nervous
tripping over wires.
Preparation, however, is key, and not just preparation of
the practice-my-delivery sort either. I’m talking about a presentation prepared
for a particular audience on a particular occasion – kind of like that
delicious Italian hoagie made especially for you with oil and mayo, no peppers, hold the oregano, extra provolone on a hard
roll. We have ALL seen the presenter that exhibits no sense of kairos, didn’t prepare
well or at all, isn’t engaging, presents a confusing argument, or has clearly
recycled the presentation from another gig. We may politely nod along like a good little audience,
but inside we’re angry! We feel our time is wasted and that the speaker only
cares about (in the words of my 6-yr-old daughter) “puffing up his attitude”
(or CV). We take notes just to pass the time and avoid slinking down into the
uncomfortable hotel conference room chairs.
We want the disrespectful presenter to just. Stop. Talking. Now. Please.
I do not ever want to inflict this agony. My goal is always to invite my victims into a
conversation I’m trying to situate for them. I want them to “get it,” so they
can take the ideas from the jumping off point I’ve provided and engage the
issue further. There are myriad
junctures at which the listener can be lost, and that is the root of so much of
my anxiety. How much do they already know? Is this the right visual aid? How
much does this group need on a slide? How loaded is this term? How much
unpacking is necessary without being a bore? Is this topic going to anger
someone in the audience? Then add to those the host of universal design issues
that I’m sure I’m handling the wrong way.
Same topic, similar spin doesn’t ever equal identical presentation.
This particular presentation is headed towards its fourth iteration. Beginning
as a written project for a grad class on rhetorical analysis, it next had to be
shaped into something suitable for an online audience during class. I believe
we had maybe 10 minutes, and there was a great deal of typing (or cut/pasting)
involved. Knowing classmates would have the transcripts to read through after
class alleviated any worry over pacing or vocal presentation as the main goal
was to get the essentials pasted into the chat box as quickly as possible while
simultaneously being able to answer questions from other MOO inhabitants. A
third iteration involved morphing the topic into 1/3 of a panel presentation on
rhetorical agency to be delivered at last summer’s May Seminar in Lubbock. Aside
from the challenges of tweaking the presentation of the topic to fit within the
panel framework, there was also pressure to create something that would be
engaging to an audience composed of peers at all stages of coursework and faculty.
Sure, we’re all TTU TCR, but the diversity of experience, interests, and expectations
is of wide girth. May Seminar
presentations can be classic, and as much as possible presenters must try to “choke
them out.” (We miss you GZ!)
This time, my topic is being shaped for an
audience of rhetoricians about whom I know very little aside from their own
presentation titles. I’m a smart cookie, but I always have terror that I’m the
least intelligent person in the hotel when I go to these things. I study the
program to see who is going to be there and what they’ll be talking about. I
look for themes, recurring topics. I read up on the conference speakers. And
then I decide on the answers to the questions I ask above. (I also go see my
therapist and pace a lot and have wine and breathe to my center. ) While I’m at a conference, I go to sessions to
do recon work – gathering info on the tone and quality of other sessions. I
take note of hecklers. I internalize which mistakes not to make. Then I might
adjust some more. Usually, I end up realizing that I’m NOT the least
intelligent person there, nor the most dreadful, and I do have some interesting
goods to deliver. It would be nice to
arrive at that conclusion without the wash of anxiety, but for me that’s
probably not going to happen. I always have to walk through it to get to the
other side.
No comments:
Post a Comment